Shunmugam vs Sugumar — 783/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTV070040392022
Filing Number
4039/2022
Filing Date
07-Sep-2022
Registration No
783/2022
Registration Date
07-Sep-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate I
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shunmugam
Adv. Thiru.Duraiveeraiyan, B.A.B.L
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sugumar
Case History
-
21-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
09-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
02-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
13-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
27-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: ST.C.No. 783/2022 (Shunmugam v. Sugumar) Date: 27.02.2026 | Court: Judicial Magistrate No.I, Mannargudi Outcome: Witness (PW1 - Shunmugam) was recalled for cross-examination following an approved petition under BNSS Section 348. The court found the petitioner's case lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. The petitioner admitted to obtaining a cheque through coercion and acknowledged filing a false case; consequently, the court held the case against the respondent (Sugumar) is unsustainable and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
25-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Jan-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Jan-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate I
-
13-Dec-2025
Lok Adalat
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-Nov-2025
Lok Adalat
Judicial Magistrate I
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
13-Sep-2025
Lok Adalat
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-Aug-2025
Lok Adalat
Judicial Magistrate I
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
28-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
12-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
02-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
16-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
16-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
12-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
29-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
28-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
17-Oct-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-Sep-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
08-Aug-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
21-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
02-May-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
28-Mar-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
31-Jan-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Jan-2023
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Jan-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
13-Dec-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
22-Nov-2022
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
18-Oct-2022
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Judicial Magistrate I
-
07-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 783/2022
Case Summary: ST.C.No. 783/2022 (Shunmugam v. Sugumar) Date: 27.02.2026 | Court: Judicial Magistrate No.I, Mannargudi Outcome: Witness (PW1 - Shunmugam) was recalled for cross-examination following an approved petition under BNSS Section 348. The court found the petitioner's case lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. The petitioner admitted to obtaining a cheque through coercion and acknowledged filing a false case; consequently, the court held the case against the respondent (Sugumar) is unsustainable and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts