Mannargudi Town Police vs Mani Advocate - Thiru.S.Natesh — 554/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTV070028072020

Filing Number

2807/2020

Filing Date

03-Dec-2020

Registration No

554/2020

Registration Date

03-Dec-2020

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

395

Police Station

MANNARGUDI P.S.

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mannargudi Town Police

    Adv. APP Gr.II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mani Advocate - Thiru.S.Natesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mannargudi acquitted the accused of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while the complainant testified about being abused with obscene language and injured with a stone by a bottle held by the accused, the eyewitness account and medical evidence contained significant inconsistencies regarding the exact location and nature of injuries, insufficient to substantiate guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate I

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate I

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate I

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate I

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate I

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate I

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate I

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate I

  14. 09-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate I

  15. 06-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  16. 05-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  17. 03-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 03-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  19. 30-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 30-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  21. 27-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  22. 23-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  23. 09-Jan-2026

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  24. 26-Dec-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  25. 12-Dec-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  26. 28-Nov-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  27. 15-Nov-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  28. 01-Nov-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  29. 25-Oct-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  30. 24-Sep-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  31. 10-Sep-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  32. 19-Aug-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  33. 06-Aug-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  34. 22-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  35. 07-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  36. 10-Jun-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  37. 02-May-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  38. 26-Mar-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  39. 24-Feb-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  40. 28-Jan-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  41. 17-Dec-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  42. 23-Oct-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  43. 21-Aug-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  44. 10-Jun-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  45. 20-Mar-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  46. 24-Jan-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  47. 20-Nov-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  48. 20-Sep-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  49. 20-Jul-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  50. 12-May-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  51. 24-Feb-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  52. 31-Oct-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  53. 01-Aug-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  54. 30-May-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  55. 11-Apr-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  56. 24-Jan-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  57. 16-Dec-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate I

  58. 16-Nov-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  59. 12-Oct-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  60. 21-Sep-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  61. 17-Aug-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  62. 15-Jun-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  63. 27-Apr-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  64. 06-Apr-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  65. 22-Feb-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  66. 15-Feb-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate I

  67. 14-Dec-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate I

  68. 03-Dec-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  69. 03-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 554/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mannargudi acquitted the accused of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while the complainant testified about being abused with obscene language and injured with a stone by a bottle held by the accused, the eyewitness account and medical evidence contained significant inconsistencies regarding the exact location and nature of injuries, insufficient to substantiate guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case