Kannan vs Geetha — 2084/2021

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 190 (1)(a),200,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-Jun-2026

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTV070026372021

Filing Number

2637/2021

Filing Date

22-Nov-2021

Registration No

2084/2021

Registration Date

22-Nov-2021

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate I

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 190 (1)(a),200,142
Mp/1/2025 Classification : Others Section KannanGeetha
Mp/2/2025 Classification : Others Section KannanGeetha
Mp/3/2025 Classification : Others Section GeethaKannan
Mp/4/2025 Classification : Others Section GeethaKannan
Mp/5/2025 Classification : Others Section GeethaKannan
Mp/6/2026 Classification : Others Section GeethaKannan

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kannan

    Adv. Thiru. S. Kandasamy , M.C.A.,M.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Geetha

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  3. 06-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 2084/2021 (Kannan v. Geetha) On 17.04.2026, the Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi recorded the deposition of witness P.W. 1 Kannan under BNSS Section 348. The witness testified regarding a loan of ₹38,000 given to the opposing party (Geetha) at 12% monthly interest. During cross-examination, the witness admitted inconsistencies in evidence regarding loan documentation, interest payments, and witness accounts cited in Exhibit 5. The court allowed cross-examination and recorded the witness's responses to questions challenging the credibility and accuracy of the documentary evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate I

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  8. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  11. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  12. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  13. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  14. 11-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  16. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  17. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  18. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  19. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  20. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  21. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  22. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  23. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  24. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  25. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  26. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  27. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  28. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  29. 14-Jun-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate I

  30. 27-May-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate I

  31. 20-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  32. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  33. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  34. 12-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  35. 24-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  36. 18-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  37. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  38. 27-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  39. 16-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  40. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  41. 08-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  42. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  43. 15-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  44. 29-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  45. 22-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  46. 13-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  47. 12-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  48. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  49. 04-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  50. 23-May-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  51. 11-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  52. 28-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  53. 11-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  54. 24-Jan-2023

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate I

  55. 29-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  56. 12-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  57. 08-Nov-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate I

  58. 16-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  59. 19-Jul-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate I

  60. 14-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  61. 26-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate I

  62. 19-Apr-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  63. 08-Mar-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  64. 28-Dec-2021

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate I

  65. 20-Dec-2021

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate I

  66. 22-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 22-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2084/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 2084/2021 (Kannan v. Geetha) On 17.04.2026, the Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi recorded the deposition of witness P.W. 1 Kannan under BNSS Section 348. The witness testified regarding a loan of ₹38,000 given to the opposing party (Geetha) at 12% monthly interest. During cross-examination, the witness admitted inconsistencies in evidence regarding loan documentation, interest payments, and witness accounts cited in Exhibit 5. The court allowed cross-examination and recorded the witness's responses to questions challenging the credibility and accuracy of the documentary evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case