Vaduvoor Police Station vs Parthasarathy — 231/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(a). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV070019452021
Filing Number
1945/2021
Filing Date
03-Jul-2021
Registration No
231/2021
Registration Date
03-Jul-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate I
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
110
Police Station
VADUVOR P.S.
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vaduvoor Police Station
Adv. APP Gr.II
Respondent(s)
-
1.Parthasarathy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 231/2021 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted respondent Parthasarathy of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although seven prosecution witnesses testified and presented vehicle inspection reports and post-mortem findings, the court identified critical gaps in the state's case. The testimony of eyewitnesses (PW4 and PW5) regarding how the accident occurred was inconsistent with the site sketch, raising doubts about whether the accused's rash/negligent driving actually caused the victim's death. The court concluded insufficient evidence established the accused's culpability beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Jun-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate I
-
08-Jun-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate I
-
04-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
02-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
02-Jun-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
21-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
14-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
07-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
27-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
21-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
07-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
30-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
24-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
10-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
02-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
17-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
10-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
30-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
27-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
20-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
12-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
06-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
30-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
18-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
04-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
20-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
30-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
16-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
30-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
22-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
09-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
21-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
17-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-May-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
20-Mar-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
07-Feb-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Jan-2025
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate I
-
10-Dec-2024
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Nov-2024
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate I
-
24-Oct-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
06-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
02-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
25-Jul-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
27-Jun-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Jun-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-Apr-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
07-Mar-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
15-Feb-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
15-Feb-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
15-Dec-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Nov-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
21-Sep-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Aug-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Jun-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
28-Apr-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
10-Feb-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
17-Nov-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
29-Aug-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate I
-
22-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Jul-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate I
-
06-Jun-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate I
-
09-May-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate I
-
07-Mar-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Jan-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate I
-
06-Dec-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate I
-
25-Oct-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate I
-
20-Sep-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate I
-
09-Aug-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Jul-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 231/2021
Case Summary: CC No. 231/2021 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted respondent Parthasarathy of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although seven prosecution witnesses testified and presented vehicle inspection reports and post-mortem findings, the court identified critical gaps in the state's case. The testimony of eyewitnesses (PW4 and PW5) regarding how the accident occurred was inconsistent with the site sketch, raising doubts about whether the accused's rash/negligent driving actually caused the victim's death. The court concluded insufficient evidence established the accused's culpability beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts