INSPECTOR OF POLICE KTR PS vs BHUVANESHWARI — 239/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),131. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTV070010162026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
1011/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
239/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate II
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
43
Police Station
KOTTUR P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE KTR PS (Police Station)
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTUR PS
Respondent(s)
BHUVANESHWARI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate II
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Part Heard
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 17-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 16-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Inspector of Police KTR PS v. Bhuvaneshwari (239/2026) The Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Bhuvaneshwari of charges under sections 296(b) and 131 BNS (causing hurt and criminal intimidation). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused verbally abused, pulled the hair, and physically assaulted the complainant. The court found the prosecution's key witness testimony unreliable and inconsistent with the facts, determining the charges were not substantiated by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Inspector of Police KTR PS v. Bhuvaneshwari (239/2026) The Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Bhuvaneshwari of charges under sections 296(b) and 131 BNS (causing hurt and criminal intimidation). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused verbally abused, pulled the hair, and physically assaulted the complainant. The court found the prosecution's key witness testimony unreliable and inconsistent with the facts, determining the charges were not substantiated by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts