INSPECTOR OF POLICE KTR PS vs BHUVANESHWARI — 239/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),131. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTV070010162026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
1011/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
239/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate II
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
43
Police Station
KOTTUR P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE KTR PS (Police Station)
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTUR PS
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHUVANESHWARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Inspector of Police KTR PS v. Bhuvaneshwari (239/2026) The Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Bhuvaneshwari of charges under sections 296(b) and 131 BNS (causing hurt and criminal intimidation). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused verbally abused, pulled the hair, and physically assaulted the complainant. The court found the prosecution's key witness testimony unreliable and inconsistent with the facts, determining the charges were not substantiated by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate II
-
18-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate II
-
17-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate II
-
16-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate II
-
13-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate II
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 239/2026
Case Summary: Inspector of Police KTR PS v. Bhuvaneshwari (239/2026) The Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Bhuvaneshwari of charges under sections 296(b) and 131 BNS (causing hurt and criminal intimidation). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused verbally abused, pulled the hair, and physically assaulted the complainant. The court found the prosecution's key witness testimony unreliable and inconsistent with the facts, determining the charges were not substantiated by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts