Sudandiradasan vs Naveenkumar — 397/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 190(1)(a),200,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTV070005952022
Filing Number
595/2022
Filing Date
17-Jun-2022
Registration No
397/2022
Registration Date
17-Jun-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate I
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sudandiradasan
Adv. Thiru. N. Swaminathan. B.A.,B.L.,
Respondent(s)
-
1.Naveenkumar
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Jul-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
25-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
04-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
In Case 397/2022, the Court recorded the deposition of Prosecution Witness 2 (P.W. 2) on 04.06.2026 before Judicial Magistrate No. I, Mannargudi. The witness, a bank employee, testified regarding bank statements and transactions of VST EXIM account (No. 34377090482) from 20.11.2020 to 17.12.2020, detailing six fund transfers totaling approximately ₹13,75,105.52 through various cheques. The deposition was recorded without cross-examination by the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
14-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
06-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
10-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
25-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
04-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
15-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-Aug-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
04-Aug-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
01-Jul-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-May-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
01-Apr-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
01-Mar-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Jan-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
17-Dec-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
22-Oct-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
09-Sep-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-Jul-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
28-May-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
25-Apr-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-Mar-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Jan-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
21-Nov-2023
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Sep-2023
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Jul-2023
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
26-May-2023
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
27-Mar-2023
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Feb-2023
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Dec-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
29-Nov-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate I
-
12-Nov-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
08-Nov-2022
Lok Adalat
Judicial Magistrate I
-
18-Oct-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
02-Aug-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-Jul-2022
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate I
-
17-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 397/2022
In Case 397/2022, the Court recorded the deposition of Prosecution Witness 2 (P.W. 2) on 04.06.2026 before Judicial Magistrate No. I, Mannargudi. The witness, a bank employee, testified regarding bank statements and transactions of VST EXIM account (No. 34377090482) from 20.11.2020 to 17.12.2020, detailing six fund transfers totaling approximately ₹13,75,105.52 through various cheques. The deposition was recorded without cross-examination by the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts