SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs SAKAYARAJ — 161/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV070004462026
e-Filing Number
31-01-2026
Filing Number
444/2026
Filing Date
02-02-2026
Registration No
161/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate II
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
KOTTUR P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTUR PS
Respondent(s)
SAKAYARAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate II
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial |
| 18-02-2026 | Service Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 161/2026 Court Decision: The Sub-Inspector of Police's case against Sakayaraj under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act resulted in an acquittal. The accused was found not guilty on April 8, 2026. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution presented evidence that 180ml of Monitor Brandy was allegedly seized from the accused on January 30, 2026, the court found critical procedural violations fatal to conviction. Under Section 32 of the TNP Act, the destruction and sampling of seized liquor must occur in the presence of a Prohibition Officer or Police Officer not below Inspector rank—separate from the seizing officer—to prevent manipulation. The court noted the seizing officer destroyed the liquor without such independent supervision, no samples were submitted for chemical analysis, and no independent witness testimonies were provided. These mandatory procedural breaches meant the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 161/2026 Court Decision: The Sub-Inspector of Police's case against Sakayaraj under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act resulted in an acquittal. The accused was found not guilty on April 8, 2026. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution presented evidence that 180ml of Monitor Brandy was allegedly seized from the accused on January 30, 2026, the court found critical procedural violations fatal to conviction. Under Section 32 of the TNP Act, the destruction and sampling of seized liquor must occur in the presence of a Prohibition Officer or Police Officer not below Inspector rank—separate from the seizing officer—to prevent manipulation. The court noted the seizing officer destroyed the liquor without such independent supervision, no samples were submitted for chemical analysis, and no independent witness testimonies were provided. These mandatory procedural breaches meant the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts