SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PVK vs MARIMUTHU — 156/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV070002882026
e-Filing Number
21-01-2026
Filing Number
288/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
156/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate II
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
PARAVAKKOTTAI P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PVK
Adv. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARAVAKOTTAI PS
Respondent(s)
MARIMUTHU
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate II
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
| 18-02-2026 | Service Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Mannargudi acquitted the accused Marimuthu under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Although the police witnesses testified that 26 bottles of Mens Club Brandy were seized from the accused on 16.01.2026 without proper authorization, the court found critical procedural violations: the seized liquor was destroyed without following mandatory procedures under Section 32 of the TNP Act (requiring samples to be taken and destruction to occur in the presence of a senior police officer or prohibition officer), no independent witness testimony was presented, and no chemical analysis samples were preserved. The court ruled these procedural lapses created reasonable doubt about the case, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Mannargudi acquitted the accused Marimuthu under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Although the police witnesses testified that 26 bottles of Mens Club Brandy were seized from the accused on 16.01.2026 without proper authorization, the court found critical procedural violations: the seized liquor was destroyed without following mandatory procedures under Section 32 of the TNP Act (requiring samples to be taken and destruction to occur in the presence of a senior police officer or prohibition officer), no independent witness testimony was presented, and no chemical analysis samples were preserved. The court ruled these procedural lapses created reasonable doubt about the case, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts