SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KTR PS vs VENMANIVANNAN — 132/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV070002632026
e-Filing Number
14-01-2026
Filing Number
263/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
132/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate II
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
07
Police Station
KOTTUR P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KTR PS (Police Station)
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTUR PS
Respondent(s)
VENMANIVANNAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate II
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial |
| 05-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 132/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Venmanivannan, was acquitted of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act. Key Reasoning: While prosecution witnesses testified that 180ml of Black Pearl Brandy was seized from the accused on 11.01.2026, the court found critical procedural violations. The alcohol was destroyed without following mandatory procedures under Section 32 of the TNP Act—specifically, samples were not drawn and destruction was not conducted in the presence of a Prohibition Officer or Police Inspector as legally required. Additionally, no independent witnesses were present during seizure, and no chemical analysis samples were preserved or sent to the court. These procedural failures, combined with insufficient corroborating evidence, rendered the prosecution case insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 132/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Venmanivannan, was acquitted of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act. Key Reasoning: While prosecution witnesses testified that 180ml of Black Pearl Brandy was seized from the accused on 11.01.2026, the court found critical procedural violations. The alcohol was destroyed without following mandatory procedures under Section 32 of the TNP Act—specifically, samples were not drawn and destruction was not conducted in the presence of a Prohibition Officer or Police Inspector as legally required. Additionally, no independent witnesses were present during seizure, and no chemical analysis samples were preserved or sent to the court. These procedural failures, combined with insufficient corroborating evidence, rendered the prosecution case insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts