STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs VENMANIVANNAN — 133/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV070002582026
e-Filing Number
11-01-2026
Filing Number
258/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
133/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate II
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
260
Police Station
KOTTUR P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTUR PS
Respondent(s)
VENMANIVANNAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate II
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial |
| 05-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Tamil Nadu v. Venmanivannan (133/2026) The Magistrate's Court acquitted the accused Venmanivannan of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the government failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although police witnesses testified that 180ml of Monitor Brandy bottles were seized from the accused on 27.12.2025, the court determined that the seizure and destruction procedures violated mandatory provisions of Section 32(c) of the TNP Act—specifically, samples were not drawn and contraband was not destroyed in the presence of a required senior police officer or Prohibition Officer, as mandated by law. The procedural violations, combined with the absence of chemical analysis, witness corroboration, and proper documentation, rendered the case insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Tamil Nadu v. Venmanivannan (133/2026) The Magistrate's Court acquitted the accused Venmanivannan of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding that the government failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although police witnesses testified that 180ml of Monitor Brandy bottles were seized from the accused on 27.12.2025, the court determined that the seizure and destruction procedures violated mandatory provisions of Section 32(c) of the TNP Act—specifically, samples were not drawn and contraband was not destroyed in the presence of a required senior police officer or Prohibition Officer, as mandated by law. The procedural violations, combined with the absence of chemical analysis, witness corroboration, and proper documentation, rendered the case insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts