STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs SAKAYARAJ — 118/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTV070002492026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
249/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
118/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mannargudi
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate II
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
219
Police Station
KOTTUR P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTUR PS
Respondent(s)
SAKAYARAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate II
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial |
| 03-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 118/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted Sakayaraj under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although police witnesses testified that Sakayaraj was caught with 180ml of Express Brandy bottles, the court found critical procedural violations under Section 32 of the TNP Act. The seized alcohol was destroyed and samples were taken without the mandatory presence of a senior police officer (Inspector rank or above) or a Prohibition Officer—a requirement the court deemed mandatory to prevent manipulation. Additionally, no independent witnesses were present at seizure, no chemical analysis was conducted on samples, and the scene documentation was incomplete. These procedural failures fatally undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 118/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted Sakayaraj under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although police witnesses testified that Sakayaraj was caught with 180ml of Express Brandy bottles, the court found critical procedural violations under Section 32 of the TNP Act. The seized alcohol was destroyed and samples were taken without the mandatory presence of a senior police officer (Inspector rank or above) or a Prohibition Officer—a requirement the court deemed mandatory to prevent manipulation. Additionally, no independent witnesses were present at seizure, no chemical analysis was conducted on samples, and the scene documentation was incomplete. These procedural failures fatally undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts