R. Gopinath vs D. Rajasekar for its power agent G. Dhurai — 157/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(D). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV060002042018
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
204/2018
Filing Date
05-12-2018
Registration No
157/2018
Registration Date
05-12-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R. Gopinath
Adv. Thiru.R.Jai Shankar and Thiru.V.K. Gopalakrishnan
R.Sathikumar for its power agent
Respondent(s)
D. Rajasekar for its power agent G. Dhurai
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 08-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 157/2018 On December 2, 2025, the District Munsif Court in Mannargudi recorded cross-examination of plaintiff's witness (CW-1), Thiru Radha (age 47), a lawyer, regarding survey numbers 196/6 and 196/10 of disputed property. The witness testified on issues including the identification of geological pathways in revenue documents, subdivision of survey parcels, and the names of owners mentioned in various revenue records (Rajangam and Dharmalingam). The court admitted the witness's testimony as recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 157/2018 On December 2, 2025, the District Munsif Court in Mannargudi recorded cross-examination of plaintiff's witness (CW-1), Thiru Radha (age 47), a lawyer, regarding survey numbers 196/6 and 196/10 of disputed property. The witness testified on issues including the identification of geological pathways in revenue documents, subdivision of survey parcels, and the names of owners mentioned in various revenue records (Rajangam and Dharmalingam). The court admitted the witness's testimony as recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts