M/s Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd rep. by its power agent Branch Manager vs S. Veeramani — 139/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7, R.1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV060001982019
Filing Number
198/2019
Filing Date
24-10-2019
Registration No
139/2019
Registration Date
24-10-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd rep. by its power agent Branch Manager
Adv. Thiru.B.Saravanan
Respondent(s)
S. Veeramani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Disposed
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 18-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 30-01-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 27-01-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S.No. 139/2019 Court Decision: The District Civil Court, Mannargudi, decreed that respondent S. Veeramani must pay Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. Rs. 45,916/- as principal amount, with 9% per annum interest from filing date to judgment date, and 6% per annum thereafter until full recovery. The respondent failed to repay a loan of Rs. 90,000/- availed on 23.10.2017 against mortgaged ornaments. Key Reasoning: The court found the bank's documentary evidence credible and compelling. The respondent neither appeared nor contested the claim. The loan agreement and bank records conclusively proved the debt obligation, making recovery due and enforceable under the promissory note executed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S.No. 139/2019 Court Decision: The District Civil Court, Mannargudi, decreed that respondent S. Veeramani must pay Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. Rs. 45,916/- as principal amount, with 9% per annum interest from filing date to judgment date, and 6% per annum thereafter until full recovery. The respondent failed to repay a loan of Rs. 90,000/- availed on 23.10.2017 against mortgaged ornaments. Key Reasoning: The court found the bank's documentary evidence credible and compelling. The respondent neither appeared nor contested the claim. The loan agreement and bank records conclusively proved the debt obligation, making recovery due and enforceable under the promissory note executed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts