Muthukumaran vs Selvakumar — 132/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7, R.1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV060001902019

Case disposed

Filing Number

190/2019

Filing Date

16-10-2019

Registration No

132/2019

Registration Date

16-10-2019

Court

District Munsif Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-District Munsif

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7, R.1

Petitioner(s)

Muthukumaran

Adv. Thiru.S.Vijayan.,B.A.B.L.,

Respondent(s)

Selvakumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

18-04-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

Judgement

16-04-2026

Arguments

06-04-2026

Arguments

01-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: OS 16/2019 Court Decision: The District Munsif Court, Mannargudi, ruled in favor of the petitioner (Muthukumaran), granting a permanent injunction preventing the respondent (Selvakumar) and his associates from interfering with the petitioner's legal ownership and peaceful possession of the disputed temple property. The court found sufficient evidence that the petitioner's organization legitimately operates the property and that the respondent unlawfully attempted to obstruct their management. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

10-02-2022
Deposition
13-10-2022
Deposition
07-06-2024
Deposition
24-06-2024
Deposition
06-11-2024
Deposition
12-11-2024
Deposition
20-06-2025
Copy of Order
20-06-2025
Copy of Order
17-07-2025
Deposition
19-08-2025
Deposition
07-10-2025
Deposition
22-10-2025
Deposition
27-02-2026
Deposition
07-03-2026
Deposition
10-03-2026
Deposition
13-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 16/2019 Court Decision: The District Munsif Court, Mannargudi, ruled in favor of the petitioner (Muthukumaran), granting a permanent injunction preventing the respondent (Selvakumar) and his associates from interfering with the petitioner's legal ownership and peaceful possession of the disputed temple property. The court found sufficient evidence that the petitioner's organization legitimately operates the property and that the respondent unlawfully attempted to obstruct their management. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Mannargudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case