Palani vs Mohanavalli — 117/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV060001492024

Filing Number

174/2024

Filing Date

03-Sep-2024

Registration No

117/2024

Registration Date

27-Sep-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-District Munsif

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed without cost

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Palani

    Adv. Thiru.S.Kandasamy, M.C.A., M.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohanavalli

  2. 2.Nadhiya

  3. 3.Senthilkumar

  4. 4.Priya

  5. 5.Selvakumar

  6. 6.Sub Registrar, Thiruthuraipoondi

  7. 7.Tamilnadu Government by its District Collector

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The District Civil Court, Mannargudi, granted permanent and prohibitory injunctions in favor of the plaintiff Palani regarding a disputed agricultural property. The court found that the plaintiff has peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property, and ordered defendants 1-5 and the 6th defendant's office not to interfere with the plaintiff's possession or create any encumbrances on the property through fraudulent documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  12. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  13. 17-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  14. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  15. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  16. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  17. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  18. 22-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  20. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  21. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  22. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  23. 12-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  24. 04-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  25. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  26. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  27. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  28. 01-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  29. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  30. 05-Aug-2025

    List / Special List

    District Munsif

  31. 23-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  32. 01-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  33. 13-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  34. 08-Apr-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  35. 17-Mar-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  36. 14-Mar-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  37. 14-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  38. 20-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  39. 27-Nov-2024

    Batta

    District Munsif

  40. 29-Oct-2024

    Batta

    District Munsif

  41. 27-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 03-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District Civil Court, Mannargudi, granted permanent and prohibitory injunctions in favor of the plaintiff Palani regarding a disputed agricultural property. The court found that the plaintiff has peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property, and ordered defendants 1-5 and the 6th defendant's office not to interfere with the plaintiff's possession or create any encumbrances on the property through fraudulent documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case