Thesapandhu vs Alexshandar — 58/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV060001182022
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
156/2022
Filing Date
06-06-2022
Registration No
58/2022
Registration Date
10-06-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thesapandhu
Adv. S. Senthamilselvan
Respondent(s)
Alexshandar
Govindaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Amendment
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Amendment |
| 21-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 09-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 25-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 13-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case 58/2022 Summary Petitioner: Thesapandhu (plaintiff in original case) Respondents: Alexshandar and Govindaraj (defendants) Court: District Civil Court, Mannargudi Date: 05.02.2025 Outcome The court dismissed the Interim Application (I.A. No. 66/2024) seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property and file a report. The petitioner had sought this relief in the underlying permanent injunction suit (Case 58/2022) involving a dispute over a shared ancestral property that was partitioned in 1993. The court held that appointing an Advocate Commissioner would indirectly determine the factual issue of possession, which must be resolved through proper evidence and witnesses during trial, not through a commissioner's report. The original case will proceed with witness examination as scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 58/2022 Summary Petitioner: Thesapandhu (plaintiff in original case) Respondents: Alexshandar and Govindaraj (defendants) Court: District Civil Court, Mannargudi Date: 05.02.2025 Outcome The court dismissed the Interim Application (I.A. No. 66/2024) seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the property and file a report. The petitioner had sought this relief in the underlying permanent injunction suit (Case 58/2022) involving a dispute over a shared ancestral property that was partitioned in 1993. The court held that appointing an Advocate Commissioner would indirectly determine the factual issue of possession, which must be resolved through proper evidence and witnesses during trial, not through a commissioner's report. The original case will proceed with witness examination as scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts