Rajkumar vs Veeraiyan — 61/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7, R.1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV060000862020

Arguments

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

Filing Number

86/2020

Filing Date

13-08-2020

Registration No

61/2020

Registration Date

17-08-2020

Court

District Munsif Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7, R.1

Petitioner(s)

Rajkumar

Adv. Thiru.S.Udayakumar,B.Sc., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

Veeraiyan

Lalitha

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

30-04-2026

Arguments

27-04-2026

Arguments

24-04-2026

Arguments

20-04-2026

Evidence

16-04-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

20-01-2023
Deposition
14-06-2024
Deposition
23-09-2024
Deposition
02-04-2025
Deposition
25-06-2025
Deposition
25-07-2025
Deposition
13-02-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
16-04-2026
Deposition
20-04-2026
Deposition

This is a cross-examination record from O.S. No.61/2020 at the District Munsif Court, Mannargudi (dated April 20, 2026) in a property dispute case. The witness (DW-2, age 54) testified regarding a property dispute involving Veeraiyyan, Lalitha, and Rajkumar, with key testimony covering property ownership, possession issues, a 2005 sale deed for Rs. 17,000 (with only Rs. 15,000 paid, Rs. 2,000 outstanding for 20 years), and the witness's position that dismissing the case merely because 20 years had passed without enforcement action would be incorrect. The case remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a cross-examination record from O.S. No.61/2020 at the District Munsif Court, Mannargudi (dated April 20, 2026) in a property dispute case. The witness (DW-2, age 54) testified regarding a property dispute involving Veeraiyyan, Lalitha, and Rajkumar, with key testimony covering property ownership, possession issues, a 2005 sale deed for Rs. 17,000 (with only Rs. 15,000 paid, Rs. 2,000 outstanding for 20 years), and the witness's position that dismissing the case merely because 20 years had passed without enforcement action would be incorrect. The case remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Mannargudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case