Dhanalakshmi vs Vimala — 77/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV060000782020
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
78/2020
Filing Date
03-08-2020
Registration No
77/2020
Registration Date
09-09-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhanalakshmi
Adv. Thiru.A.Thinakaran
Kumar
Selvaraj
Selvarani
Respondent(s)
Vimala
Sneha
Preetha
Thisa
Mayakrishnan
Sub Registrar, Mannargudi
The District collector Tiruvarur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 17-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 21-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 15-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Civil Court at Mannargudi allowed Interim Application No. 339/2023 in OS No. 77/2020 dated 01.10.2024. The court exonerated the 1st respondent from guardianship duties and permitted the 2nd and 3rd respondents (who have now attained majority at age 18) to proceed with the case as direct parties instead of through their guardian. The court found no prejudice in allowing the two former minors to independently conduct the litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Civil Court at Mannargudi allowed Interim Application No. 339/2023 in OS No. 77/2020 dated 01.10.2024. The court exonerated the 1st respondent from guardianship duties and permitted the 2nd and 3rd respondents (who have now attained majority at age 18) to proceed with the case as direct parties instead of through their guardian. The court found no prejudice in allowing the two former minors to independently conduct the litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts