Chithra vs Nepolian — 45/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7, R.1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV060000572020
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
57/2020
Filing Date
13-07-2020
Registration No
45/2020
Registration Date
15-07-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chithra
Adv. Thiru.S.Ramakrishnan,B.Sc.B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Nepolian
N. Saravanan
C Saravanan
Murugananam
The Sub Registrar, Mannargudi.
The District Registrar, Nagapattinam
The District Collector, Thiruvarur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 27-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 45/2020 (Chithra v. Nepolian and others) On March 23, 2026, petitioner Chithra (PW-1), age 56, testified before the District Munsif Court, Mannargudi in this civil suit. During cross-examination by defendants 5-7, Chithra clarified that she filed the case regarding property documents and stated she came to know about certain documents only in 2020; she also confirmed she has no claims against defendants 5-7. The court recorded her testimony as admissible evidence, and the case proceeded with the examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 45/2020 (Chithra v. Nepolian and others) On March 23, 2026, petitioner Chithra (PW-1), age 56, testified before the District Munsif Court, Mannargudi in this civil suit. During cross-examination by defendants 5-7, Chithra clarified that she filed the case regarding property documents and stated she came to know about certain documents only in 2020; she also confirmed she has no claims against defendants 5-7. The court recorded her testimony as admissible evidence, and the case proceeded with the examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts