Rajkumar vs Sumathi — 43/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 06th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV060000562025
Filing Number
67/2025
Filing Date
21-04-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
23-04-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajkumar
Adv. Thiru.S.Vijayan.,B.A.B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Sumathi
Nadhiya
Kalyani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 43/2025 Court: District Munsif Court, Mannargudi Date: 6 April 2026 Decision: The court granted a permanent injunction in favor of petitioner Rajkumar, restraining respondents Sumathi, Nadhiya, and Kalyani from interfering with, occupying, or disturbing Rajkumar's peaceful possession and ownership of a property purchased on 26 February 2018 for ₹738/2018 (registered document). The court found that Rajkumar's ownership was established through valid sale deed and revenue documents (patta, chitta, and A-register) registered in his name, while respondents failed to appear or contest the claim, resulting in ex-parte judgment against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 43/2025 Court: District Munsif Court, Mannargudi Date: 6 April 2026 Decision: The court granted a permanent injunction in favor of petitioner Rajkumar, restraining respondents Sumathi, Nadhiya, and Kalyani from interfering with, occupying, or disturbing Rajkumar's peaceful possession and ownership of a property purchased on 26 February 2018 for ₹738/2018 (registered document). The court found that Rajkumar's ownership was established through valid sale deed and revenue documents (patta, chitta, and A-register) registered in his name, while respondents failed to appear or contest the claim, resulting in ex-parte judgment against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts