Tamizhazhagan vs Murugesan — 18/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV060000442023
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
68/2023
Filing Date
05-04-2023
Registration No
18/2023
Registration Date
17-04-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tamizhazhagan
Adv. Thiru.P.Radha B.A.B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Murugesan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 01-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No.18/2023 before the District Munsif Court, Mannargudi, the case proceeded on 26.02.2026 with examination and cross-examination of PW-3 (Rajeendran, age 61) regarding a property dispute involving ancestral lands of Srinivasan and partition among his three sons (Saminathan, Rajeendran, and Nagappan). The witness testified that the defendant Murugesan has no legal rights to the disputed properties as he is only the grandson through his father Saminathan, and the plaintiff's claims regarding ownership cannot be sustained against the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No.18/2023 before the District Munsif Court, Mannargudi, the case proceeded on 26.02.2026 with examination and cross-examination of PW-3 (Rajeendran, age 61) regarding a property dispute involving ancestral lands of Srinivasan and partition among his three sons (Saminathan, Rajeendran, and Nagappan). The witness testified that the defendant Murugesan has no legal rights to the disputed properties as he is only the grandson through his father Saminathan, and the plaintiff's claims regarding ownership cannot be sustained against the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts