Sakthivel vs Lenin — 22/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV060000342024
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
34/2024
Filing Date
12-03-2024
Registration No
22/2024
Registration Date
15-03-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sakthivel
Adv. Thiru.S.Vijayan.,B.A.B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Lenin
Pandiyan
Deivanai
Neelaveni
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is an O.S. (Original Suit) No. 22/2024 from the District Munsif Court, Mannargudi, dated April 16, 2026. The document records the cross-examination of witness PW-2 (Muthumaniakam, age 59) regarding a land dispute. The witness testified about a property sale, admitting under cross-examination that he did not personally sell the land to the plaintiff but his brother did, and that he lacks knowledge of most case details. The court record was read over and admitted by the witness as correct, with no final order on the merits provided in this document—it appears to be an interim examination record in an ongoing civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is an O.S. (Original Suit) No. 22/2024 from the District Munsif Court, Mannargudi, dated April 16, 2026. The document records the cross-examination of witness PW-2 (Muthumaniakam, age 59) regarding a land dispute. The witness testified about a property sale, admitting under cross-examination that he did not personally sell the land to the plaintiff but his brother did, and that he lacks knowledge of most case details. The court record was read over and admitted by the witness as correct, with no final order on the merits provided in this document—it appears to be an interim examination record in an ongoing civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts