Malarkodi vs Ponnusami — 11/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV060000162022
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
20/2022
Filing Date
21-01-2022
Registration No
11/2022
Registration Date
25-01-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malarkodi
Adv. Thiru.R.P.Lenin
Respondent(s)
Ponnusami
Vadukanathan
Suresh
Rajagopal
Athithan
The Tahsildar, Mannargudi
The District Collector, Tiruvarur.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript from O.S. No.11/2022 in the District Munsif Court, Mannargudi, dated March 12, 2026. The document records the testimony of defendant's witness (DW-1) Adityan regarding a property dispute involving land parcels designated as Survey No. 96/1 and adjoining properties (Schedules A and B). The witness was examined on issues relating to property boundaries, access rights, the construction of a temple, and the plaintiff's right to use a passage through the defendant's property. The court admitted the witness testimony into record after it was read over and interpreted in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript from O.S. No.11/2022 in the District Munsif Court, Mannargudi, dated March 12, 2026. The document records the testimony of defendant's witness (DW-1) Adityan regarding a property dispute involving land parcels designated as Survey No. 96/1 and adjoining properties (Schedules A and B). The witness was examined on issues relating to property boundaries, access rights, the construction of a temple, and the plaintiff's right to use a passage through the defendant's property. The court admitted the witness testimony into record after it was read over and interpreted in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts