Jegannathan vs Pushpanathan — 19/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 30. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 30th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV060000072019

Case disposed

Filing Number

7/2019

Filing Date

02-01-2019

Registration No

19/2019

Registration Date

15-02-2019

Court

District Munsif Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-District Munsif

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed without cost

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 30

Petitioner(s)

Jegannathan

Adv. Thiru.S.Vijayan.,B.A.B.L.,

Respondent(s)

Pushpanathan

Vadivel

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

30-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Judgement

12-03-2026

Judgement

06-03-2026

Arguments

04-03-2026

Judgement

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Court Judgment The District Munsiff Court of Mannargudi ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a property dispute case. The court determined that the survey number in the plaintiff's father's 2000 deed was incorrectly recorded as 201/D5 when it should read 201/1D5, and ordered the defendant to correct this error and deliver possession of the 0.25-cent property to the plaintiff within 60 days, along with issuing a permanent injunction against further trespass on the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

17-03-2023
Deposition
20-12-2023
Deposition
27-09-2023
Copy of Decree
20-12-2023
Deposition
05-01-2024
Deposition
28-02-2024
Deposition
14-08-2024
Deposition
21-06-2024
Copy of Decree
06-09-2024
Deposition
22-10-2024
Deposition
19-11-2024
Deposition
06-01-2025
Deposition
03-01-2025
Deposition
10-03-2025
Deposition
02-12-2025
Deposition
23-01-2026
Deposition
23-01-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Judgment The District Munsiff Court of Mannargudi ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a property dispute case. The court determined that the survey number in the plaintiff's father's 2000 deed was incorrectly recorded as 201/D5 when it should read 201/1D5, and ordered the defendant to correct this error and deliver possession of the 0.25-cent property to the plaintiff within 60 days, along with issuing a permanent injunction against further trespass on the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Mannargudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case