P.Ponnusamy vs R.IndhiraGandhi Advocate - Thiru.V.Ravichandran, B.Sc., B.L., — 29/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 03-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV050011952023

Filing Number

849/2023

Filing Date

22-Dec-2023

Registration No

29/2024

Registration Date

06-Feb-2024

Court

Sub Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.Ponnusamy

    Adv. Thiru.S.Udayakumar, B.Sc., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.IndhiraGandhi Advocate - Thiru.V.Ravichandran, B.Sc., B.L.,

  2. 2.Arivazhagan

    Adv. Thiru.V.Ravichandran, B.Sc., B.L.,

  3. 3.Selvendhiran

    Adv. Thiru.V.Ravichandran, B.Sc., B.L.,

  4. 4.The Sub Registrar, Ullikkottai

  5. 5.The District Collector

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: OS 29/2024 Court: Subordinate Court, Mannargudi Date: 09.04.2026 This is a property dispute involving a land sale agreement. Petitioner P. Ponnusamy filed suit against respondents Indhira Gandhi (Advocate) and others regarding ownership rights to property (Plot No. 383/3). During cross-examination of PW-1 on 09.04.2026, the witness testified about a sale agreement involving respondent Raghunanthiran, who allegedly failed to complete the transaction despite receiving payment. The witness claimed the property was originally owned by Krishnasamy (Raghunanthiran's elder brother) and involved a village partition document. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which the witness confirmed as accurate before signing. The case involves disputes over land ownership, sale agreements, and competing claims between parties regarding the rightful owner of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 18-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 18-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 23-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 20-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 03-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 27-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 23-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 17-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 27-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 25-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 22-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 06-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 22-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 29/2024 Court: Subordinate Court, Mannargudi Date: 09.04.2026 This is a property dispute involving a land sale agreement. Petitioner P. Ponnusamy filed suit against respondents Indhira Gandhi (Advocate) and others regarding ownership rights to property (Plot No. 383/3). During cross-examination of PW-1 on 09.04.2026, the witness testified about a sale agreement involving respondent Raghunanthiran, who allegedly failed to complete the transaction despite receiving payment. The witness claimed the property was originally owned by Krishnasamy (Raghunanthiran's elder brother) and involved a village partition document. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which the witness confirmed as accurate before signing. The case involves disputes over land ownership, sale agreements, and competing claims between parties regarding the rightful owner of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case