Mariyappan rep by hispower agent Abhirami vs Sundhar — 80/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR 7 R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV050010202024
Filing Number
757/2024
Filing Date
03-Dec-2024
Registration No
80/2025
Registration Date
23-Apr-2025
Court
Sub Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mariyappan rep by hispower agent Abhirami
Adv. Thiru.Pandi Thennavan, M.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sundhar
-
2.Vadivazhaki
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary In Civil Case No. 80/2025 at the Subordinate Court, Mannargudi, dated March 12, 2026, the court recorded the testimony of two prosecution witnesses (PW-2 and PW-3) under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. Both witnesses affirmed their statements, which were transcribed, read back to them, and signed before the court. No cross-examination by the defendant's counsel was conducted for either witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Publication
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 80/2025
Summary In Civil Case No. 80/2025 at the Subordinate Court, Mannargudi, dated March 12, 2026, the court recorded the testimony of two prosecution witnesses (PW-2 and PW-3) under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. Both witnesses affirmed their statements, which were transcribed, read back to them, and signed before the court. No cross-examination by the defendant's counsel was conducted for either witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts