Selvaganapathy vs Vijayakumar — 336/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC ORDER 21 RULE 11 CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV050006202025

e-Filing Number

18-11-2025

Filing Number

688/2025

Filing Date

19-Nov-2025

Registration No

336/2025

Registration Date

19-Dec-2025

Court

Sub Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed with cost

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC ORDER 21 RULE 11 CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Selvaganapathy

    Adv. UDAYAKUMAR S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijayakumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary In this Civil Case No. 336/2025 before the Subordinate Court, Mannargudi (dated 12.03.2026), the court recorded the testimony of PW-1 (witness Sesalvakandi, age 58) under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness affirmed documents including a promissory note dated 05.05.2024, notice dated 22.08.2025, and the plaintiff's Aadhar card. The court found the witness's testimony credible and admissible, with no cross-examination conducted by the defendant, and proceeded to render judgment based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 336/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this Civil Case No. 336/2025 before the Subordinate Court, Mannargudi (dated 12.03.2026), the court recorded the testimony of PW-1 (witness Sesalvakandi, age 58) under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness affirmed documents including a promissory note dated 05.05.2024, notice dated 22.08.2025, and the plaintiff's Aadhar card. The court found the witness's testimony credible and admissible, with no cross-examination conducted by the defendant, and proceeded to render judgment based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case