Arummozhi vs Mohandass — 128/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 8 (1). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV050005452021

Filing Number

578/2021

Filing Date

25-Aug-2021

Registration No

128/2021

Registration Date

25-Aug-2021

Court

Sub Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 8 (1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arummozhi

    Adv. Thiru.S.Udayakumar,B.Sc., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohandass

  2. 2.Yoganantham

  3. 3.Baby

  4. 4.Revendran

  5. 5.Reshma

  6. 6.The Regional Manager, Agricultural Insurance company ltd

  7. 7.The Secretary, rep by Agricultral cooperative society

  8. 8.The Village Administrative Officer,

  9. 9.The Tashildar

  10. 10.The District Collector,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Court Judgment The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking a permanent injunction and partition of ancestral agricultural property. The court ruled that the plaintiff lacked legal standing to seek partition as the property was held by multiple co-owners, and that the plaintiff could not unilaterally claim shares of agricultural subsidy benefits intended for the land's current cultivators without proper partition proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 28-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 18-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 04-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 28-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 23-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 09-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 11-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 21-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 24-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 01-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 20-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 08-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 20-Feb-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 14-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 28-Nov-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  31. 28-Nov-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 12-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 03-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 22-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 20-Feb-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  43. 20-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  44. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  45. 09-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  46. 12-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  47. 17-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  48. 16-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  49. 03-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  50. 19-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  51. 05-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  52. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  53. 30-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  54. 21-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  55. 06-Apr-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  56. 06-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  57. 28-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  58. 14-Mar-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  59. 14-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  60. 28-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  61. 15-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  62. 09-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  63. 23-Jan-2023

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  64. 22-Dec-2022

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  65. 15-Dec-2022

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  66. 02-Dec-2022

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  67. 10-Nov-2022

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  68. 05-Sep-2022

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  69. 14-Jul-2022

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  70. 02-Jun-2022

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  71. 20-Apr-2022

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  72. 04-Apr-2022

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  73. 11-Jan-2022

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  74. 18-Nov-2021

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  75. 20-Oct-2021

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  76. 29-Sep-2021

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  77. 25-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  78. 25-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Judgment The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking a permanent injunction and partition of ancestral agricultural property. The court ruled that the plaintiff lacked legal standing to seek partition as the property was held by multiple co-owners, and that the plaintiff could not unilaterally claim shares of agricultural subsidy benefits intended for the land's current cultivators without proper partition proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case