Somasundharam vs Jayaraj Automobiles Agency — 62/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section Sec 140, 166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Orders Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTV050005062024

e-Filing Number

06-06-2024

Filing Number

364/2024

Filing Date

06-Jun-2024

Registration No

62/2024

Registration Date

14-Jun-2024

Court

Sub Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section Sec 140, 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Somasundharam

    Adv. Thiru.M.Panneerselvam, B.A., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jayaraj Automobiles Agency

  2. 2.The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Madurai rep. by its The Divisional Manager

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary - MCOP 62/2024 This case involves Somasundharam's testimony in a motor accident compensation petition against Jayaraj Automobiles Agency and New India Assurance Company Ltd. The accident occurred on 10.01.2024, resulting in the petitioner's leg fracture requiring hospitalization from 10.01.2024 to 29.01.2024. The petitioner claimed compensation for medical treatments including subsequent hospitalizations on 11.03.2024 and 15.04.2024. During cross-examination, disputes arose regarding causation of gallstone formation (allegedly from overdose medication post-accident) and insurance claim amounts received—the petitioner testified receiving ₹2,92,527 under Tamil Nadu Medical Insurance Scheme and ₹56,160 under New Health Insurance, while denying receipt of a claimed ₹1,28,740 from a third treatment. The court recorded the witness's testimony on 11.02.2026, which was transcribed and acknowledged by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 05-Nov-2025

    Await Notice

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 24-Sep-2025

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 17-Jul-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 14-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 24-Apr-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 24-Apr-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 08-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 05-Mar-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 18-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 27-Nov-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 25-Sep-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 07-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 14-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 06-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - MCOP 62/2024 This case involves Somasundharam's testimony in a motor accident compensation petition against Jayaraj Automobiles Agency and New India Assurance Company Ltd. The accident occurred on 10.01.2024, resulting in the petitioner's leg fracture requiring hospitalization from 10.01.2024 to 29.01.2024. The petitioner claimed compensation for medical treatments including subsequent hospitalizations on 11.03.2024 and 15.04.2024. During cross-examination, disputes arose regarding causation of gallstone formation (allegedly from overdose medication post-accident) and insurance claim amounts received—the petitioner testified receiving ₹2,92,527 under Tamil Nadu Medical Insurance Scheme and ₹56,160 under New Health Insurance, while denying receipt of a claimed ₹1,28,740 from a third treatment. The court recorded the witness's testimony on 11.02.2026, which was transcribed and acknowledged by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case