Selvaganapathi vs Akila — 233/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR 7 R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV050004072025

Filing Number

462/2025

Filing Date

25-Aug-2025

Registration No

233/2025

Registration Date

26-Sep-2025

Court

Sub Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed with cost

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR 7 R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Selvaganapathi

    Adv. Thiru.S.Udayakumar, B.Sc., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Akila

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    The Subordinate Court of Mannargudi (Case No. 233/2025) heard testimony from the plaintiff's witness on March 12, 2026. The court recorded the witness statement (PW-1) and admitted documentary evidence including a promissory note dated April 4, 2024, and postal acknowledgment receipts. The defendant had no cross-examination, and the court accepted the witness testimony as credible for purposes of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 26-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 26-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 233/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Subordinate Court of Mannargudi (Case No. 233/2025) heard testimony from the plaintiff's witness on March 12, 2026. The court recorded the witness statement (PW-1) and admitted documentary evidence including a promissory note dated April 4, 2024, and postal acknowledgment receipts. The defendant had no cross-examination, and the court accepted the witness testimony as credible for purposes of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case