Mythili vs Pasupathi Advocate - Thiru.S.Udayakumar, B.Sc., B.L., — 103/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7r1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV050003182022

Filing Number

391/2022

Filing Date

15-Jul-2022

Registration No

103/2022

Registration Date

30-Sep-2022

Court

Sub Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7r1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mythili

    Adv. Thiru. R.Sampathkumar., B.A.L.,B.L.,

  2. 2.Kowsalya

  3. 3.Rajalakshmi

  4. 4.Sridharan

  5. 5.Usha

  6. 6.Narayanan

  7. 7.Seema

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pasupathi Advocate - Thiru.S.Udayakumar, B.Sc., B.L.,

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 13-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 06-Nov-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 18-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 103/2022 Summary On August 22, 2025, the Mannargudi Court (Judge S. Muthuraman) recorded the examination-in-chief of Defence Witness 1, Chinnasamy (age 65), in this civil case between Mythili, Kowsalya, and Rajalakshmi versus Pasupathi Advocate. The witness affirmed his testimony under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming the details in his written statement. Cross-examination was deferred upon request and the witness's testimony was recorded and signed before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 20-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 18-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 10-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 04-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 28-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 10-Dec-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 07-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 03-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 12-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 10-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 06-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 29-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 18-Dec-2023

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 31-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 01-Aug-2023

    Mediation

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 04-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 10-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 19-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  43. 31-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  44. 30-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 15-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case 103/2022 Summary On August 22, 2025, the Mannargudi Court (Judge S. Muthuraman) recorded the examination-in-chief of Defence Witness 1, Chinnasamy (age 65), in this civil case between Mythili, Kowsalya, and Rajalakshmi versus Pasupathi Advocate. The witness affirmed his testimony under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming the details in his written statement. Cross-examination was deferred upon request and the witness's testimony was recorded and signed before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case