Saravanan vs Sathishkumar — 134/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV050003012025
Filing Number
336/2025
Filing Date
15-Jul-2025
Registration No
134/2025
Registration Date
18-Jul-2025
Court
Sub Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Saravanan
Adv. A.Thinakaran, B.A., B.L.,
-
2.Indhumathi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sathishkumar
-
2.Sathiyamoorthi
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 134/2025 On March 24, 2026, the Subordinate Court in Mannargudi recorded witness statements (PW-3 and PW-4) in this case between Saravanan and Indhumathi (petitioners) versus Sathishkumar and Sathiyamoorthi (respondents). Two plaintiff witnesses testified under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873; their statements were recorded, read back, confirmed, and signed before the court. No cross-examination by the defendant was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Lok Adalat
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Service Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 134/2025
Case Summary: 134/2025 On March 24, 2026, the Subordinate Court in Mannargudi recorded witness statements (PW-3 and PW-4) in this case between Saravanan and Indhumathi (petitioners) versus Sathishkumar and Sathiyamoorthi (respondents). Two plaintiff witnesses testified under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873; their statements were recorded, read back, confirmed, and signed before the court. No cross-examination by the defendant was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts