Selvaganapathi vs Senguttuvan — 129/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR 7 R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV050002512025

Filing Number

281/2025

Filing Date

21-Jun-2025

Registration No

129/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

Sub Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed with cost

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR 7 R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Selvaganapathi

    Adv. Thiru.S.Udayakumar, B.Sc., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Senguttuvan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    The Subordinate Court, Mannargudi accepted the plaintiff's testimony in Civil Case No. 129/2025 dated March 12, 2026, where the plaintiff (PW-1) affirmed statements regarding a promissory note dated 05.05.2023 and subsequent notices sent to the defendant. The court recorded the witness testimony, which was typed, printed, read back to the witness for confirmation, and signed before the judge. The defendant did not cross-examine the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 19-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 13-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 19-Aug-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 15-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 21-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 129/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Subordinate Court, Mannargudi accepted the plaintiff's testimony in Civil Case No. 129/2025 dated March 12, 2026, where the plaintiff (PW-1) affirmed statements regarding a promissory note dated 05.05.2023 and subsequent notices sent to the defendant. The court recorded the witness testimony, which was typed, printed, read back to the witness for confirmation, and signed before the judge. The defendant did not cross-examine the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case