Jeevanatham vs Saraswathi — 160/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section or 6 r 14A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV050002502020
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
250/2020
Filing Date
17-03-2020
Registration No
160/2020
Registration Date
28-09-2020
Court
Sub Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jeevanatham
Adv. Thiru. S. Raman., B.A.B.L.,
Ganesh
Kalaiselvi
Respondent(s)
Saraswathi
Minor Manunidhi represented by mother saraswathi
Minor Mathivadathanam represented by mother saraswathi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Appearance
Appearance
Lok Adalat
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 14-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 11-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 160/2020 On August 5, 2025, the Subordinate Court at Mannargudi recorded testimony from the third witness (PW3) in this case involving disputes between Jeevanatham, Ganesh, Kalaiselvi (petitioners) and Saraswathi with minor children (respondents). The witness testified regarding an RCC house construction and related financial transactions. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged gaps in his affidavit regarding details of fund providers, police investigation dates, and nearby residence documentation. The court accepted the witness's testimony with noted inconsistencies and the case proceedings continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 160/2020 On August 5, 2025, the Subordinate Court at Mannargudi recorded testimony from the third witness (PW3) in this case involving disputes between Jeevanatham, Ganesh, Kalaiselvi (petitioners) and Saraswathi with minor children (respondents). The witness testified regarding an RCC house construction and related financial transactions. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged gaps in his affidavit regarding details of fund providers, police investigation dates, and nearby residence documentation. The court accepted the witness's testimony with noted inconsistencies and the case proceedings continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts