Kalarani vs Sri Jayavilas Bus Service Firm rep. by its Proprietor — 36/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section Sec 163A,166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTV050002472024
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2024
Filing Number
179/2024
Filing Date
18-03-2024
Registration No
36/2024
Registration Date
22-03-2024
Court
Sub Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalarani
Adv. Thiru.B.Tamizharasan, B.Sc., B.L.,
Suriyadharshini
Adv. Thiru.B.Tamizharasan, B.Sc., B.L.,
Minor. Pudhalvi represented by her next Friend and Mother Kalarani
Adv. Thiru.B.Tamizharasan, B.Sc., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Sri Jayavilas Bus Service Firm rep. by its Proprietor
National Insurance Company Limited, Kumbakonam rep. by its Branch Manager
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Enquiry
Amendment
Lok Adalat
Amendment
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 14-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 11-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 18-02-2026 | Amendment |
| 04-02-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case 36/2024 Summary A witness (Thirukkumaran, age 55) testified on 13.08.2025 in this motor accident case involving petitioners Kalarani and Suriyadharshini against Sri Jayavilas Bus Service and National Insurance Company. The witness testified regarding a bus accident (Vehicle TN 50 6066) that occurred on 24.12.2023 at 4:30 PM, confirming key facts about the incident and his presence at the scene. His examination-in-chief and cross-examination testimony was recorded and affirmed before the Subordinate Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 36/2024 Summary A witness (Thirukkumaran, age 55) testified on 13.08.2025 in this motor accident case involving petitioners Kalarani and Suriyadharshini against Sri Jayavilas Bus Service and National Insurance Company. The witness testified regarding a bus accident (Vehicle TN 50 6066) that occurred on 24.12.2023 at 4:30 PM, confirming key facts about the incident and his presence at the scene. His examination-in-chief and cross-examination testimony was recorded and affirmed before the Subordinate Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts