Kavitha vs Uma Advocate - Thiru.P.Ponnulingam, B.A.,B.L., — 105/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7 R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV050002242023
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
122/2023
Filing Date
01-03-2023
Registration No
105/2023
Registration Date
25-04-2023
Court
Sub Court, Mannargudi
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kavitha
Adv. Thiru.S.Udayakumar, B.Sc., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Uma Advocate - Thiru.P.Ponnulingam, B.A.,B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Appearance
Lok Adalat
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 06-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 105/2023 (Kavitha v. Uma Advocate) Court: Subordinate Court, Mannargudi Date: 16.04.2026 The court recorded the examination-in-chief of Petitioner (PW-1) Kavitha regarding a monetary dispute. The petitioner testified about a loan transaction, an agreement document (Exhibit 1), and related circumstances. During cross-examination, discrepancies emerged regarding the loan amount (₹8 lakhs vs. ₹3 lakhs claimed), the agreement document's authenticity, witness signatures, and whether a settlement had already been reached between parties. The court admitted Exhibit 1 into evidence after the witness acknowledged it in open court. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 105/2023 (Kavitha v. Uma Advocate) Court: Subordinate Court, Mannargudi Date: 16.04.2026 The court recorded the examination-in-chief of Petitioner (PW-1) Kavitha regarding a monetary dispute. The petitioner testified about a loan transaction, an agreement document (Exhibit 1), and related circumstances. During cross-examination, discrepancies emerged regarding the loan amount (₹8 lakhs vs. ₹3 lakhs claimed), the agreement document's authenticity, witness signatures, and whether a settlement had already been reached between parties. The court admitted Exhibit 1 into evidence after the witness acknowledged it in open court. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts