Kavitha vs Uma Advocate - Thiru.P.Ponnulingam, B.A.,B.L., — 105/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7 R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV050002242023

Evidence

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

122/2023

Filing Date

01-03-2023

Registration No

105/2023

Registration Date

25-04-2023

Court

Sub Court, Mannargudi

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7 R1

Petitioner(s)

Kavitha

Adv. Thiru.S.Udayakumar, B.Sc., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

Uma Advocate - Thiru.P.Ponnulingam, B.A.,B.L.,

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

09-06-2026

Evidence

02-06-2026

Evidence

16-04-2026

Evidence

14-03-2026

Appearance

06-03-2026

Lok Adalat

Interim Orders

20-02-2026
Deposition
16-04-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: OS 105/2023 (Kavitha v. Uma Advocate) Court: Subordinate Court, Mannargudi Date: 16.04.2026 The court recorded the examination-in-chief of Petitioner (PW-1) Kavitha regarding a monetary dispute. The petitioner testified about a loan transaction, an agreement document (Exhibit 1), and related circumstances. During cross-examination, discrepancies emerged regarding the loan amount (₹8 lakhs vs. ₹3 lakhs claimed), the agreement document's authenticity, witness signatures, and whether a settlement had already been reached between parties. The court admitted Exhibit 1 into evidence after the witness acknowledged it in open court. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 105/2023 (Kavitha v. Uma Advocate) Court: Subordinate Court, Mannargudi Date: 16.04.2026 The court recorded the examination-in-chief of Petitioner (PW-1) Kavitha regarding a monetary dispute. The petitioner testified about a loan transaction, an agreement document (Exhibit 1), and related circumstances. During cross-examination, discrepancies emerged regarding the loan amount (₹8 lakhs vs. ₹3 lakhs claimed), the agreement document's authenticity, witness signatures, and whether a settlement had already been reached between parties. The court admitted Exhibit 1 into evidence after the witness acknowledged it in open court. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Mannargudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case