RAMADOSS vs U. ROOBHA Advocate - THIRU. S.R. AYYAPPAN — 81/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV040001452022
Filing Number
268/2022
Filing Date
21-11-2022
Registration No
81/2022
Registration Date
16-12-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
4-DISTRICT MUNSIF
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMADOSS
Adv. THIRU. T.P.S. MANIKANNAN
Respondent(s)
U. ROOBHA Advocate - THIRU. S.R. AYYAPPAN
S. Udayakumar
Adv. THIRU. S.R. AYYAPPAN
Deputy Block Development Officer (Panchayat)
President, Panchayat Board, Vepathangudi.
Village Administrative Officer, Vepanthangudi.
The District Collector, Tiruvarur.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DISTRICT MUNSIF
Disposed
Judgement
Compliance
Compliance
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 30-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 26-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
The court in O.S. No. 81/2022 (dated 09.03.2026) found that the defendant witness lacked knowledge about the case details, including the nature of the dispute, parties involved, and relevant transactions. The court concluded that no substantive evidence or arguments were presented during the cross-examination to establish the defendant's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court in O.S. No. 81/2022 (dated 09.03.2026) found that the defendant witness lacked knowledge about the case details, including the nature of the dispute, parties involved, and relevant transactions. The court concluded that no substantive evidence or arguments were presented during the cross-examination to establish the defendant's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts