T. MEENA vs C. EHAMBAERAM Advocate - THIRU. T.P.S. MANIKANNAN — 30/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7r1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV040000652022
Filing Number
102/2022
Filing Date
31-05-2022
Registration No
30/2022
Registration Date
01-06-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
4-DISTRICT MUNSIF
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T. MEENA
Adv. THIRU. M. GANESAN
Respondent(s)
C. EHAMBAERAM Advocate - THIRU. T.P.S. MANIKANNAN
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DISTRICT MUNSIF
Disposed
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 26-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 10-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit regarding a boundary dispute over property plot 53/1A1. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish clear ownership and possession of the contested land, and that the defendant had been in possession since 1995 with proper survey demarcation. The court ruled that the plaintiff's claims lacked sufficient documentary evidence and credibility to support the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit regarding a boundary dispute over property plot 53/1A1. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish clear ownership and possession of the contested land, and that the defendant had been in possession since 1995 with proper survey demarcation. The court ruled that the plaintiff's claims lacked sufficient documentary evidence and credibility to support the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts