A.M. MEGANADHA SWAMY THIRUKKOVIL, THIRUMEYACHUR REP. BY ITS HEREDITARY TRUSTEE vs MEGANATHAN — 163/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV030006142024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
469/2024
Filing Date
03-10-2024
Registration No
163/2024
Registration Date
18-12-2024
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.M. MEGANADHA SWAMY THIRUKKOVIL, THIRUMEYACHUR REP. BY ITS HEREDITARY TRUSTEE
Adv. THIRU. T.P.S. MANIKANNAN, M.Com., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
MEGANATHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 163/2024 This is a temple property dispute case before the Subordinate Court, Tiruvarur, involving A.M. Meganadha Swamy Thirukkovil (represented by its hereditary trustee) as petitioner against Meganathan as respondent. The case involves Section 10 of the Indian Succession Act, 1875, and concerns temple affairs and arrears details from the Tamil Nadu Government Hindu Religious Endowments Department. The court recorded the petitioner's witness examination on 13.03.2026, admitted the written statement as evidence, and adjourned the matter for cross-examination of the respondent's witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 163/2024 This is a temple property dispute case before the Subordinate Court, Tiruvarur, involving A.M. Meganadha Swamy Thirukkovil (represented by its hereditary trustee) as petitioner against Meganathan as respondent. The case involves Section 10 of the Indian Succession Act, 1875, and concerns temple affairs and arrears details from the Tamil Nadu Government Hindu Religious Endowments Department. The court recorded the petitioner's witness examination on 13.03.2026, admitted the written statement as evidence, and adjourned the matter for cross-examination of the respondent's witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts