AMUDHA vs APPANU @ MANIKANDAN — 39/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTV030006082021
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
605/2021
Filing Date
12-11-2021
Registration No
39/2021
Registration Date
12-11-2021
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMUDHA
Adv. THIRU. T.P.S. MANIKANNAN
Respondent(s)
APPANU @ MANIKANDAN
B. Ashokumar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Orders
Evidence
Evidence
Await Records
Await Records
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Orders |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-02-2026 | Await Records |
| 12-12-2025 | Await Records |
Interim Orders
In MCOP Case 39/2021 before the Tiruvarur Subordinate Court, petitioner Amudha filed a petition under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1875. The court accepted Amudha's affidavit as her examination-in-chief evidence, along with 12 supporting documents including FIR reports, medical certificates, X-rays, and bank statements. The respondents (Appanu @ Manikandan and B. Ashokumar) did not cross-examine the petitioner. The court allowed the petition and issued the required order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In MCOP Case 39/2021 before the Tiruvarur Subordinate Court, petitioner Amudha filed a petition under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1875. The court accepted Amudha's affidavit as her examination-in-chief evidence, along with 12 supporting documents including FIR reports, medical certificates, X-rays, and bank statements. The respondents (Appanu @ Manikandan and B. Ashokumar) did not cross-examine the petitioner. The court allowed the petition and issued the required order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts