AMUDHA vs APPANU @ MANIKANDAN — 39/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Orders Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTV030006082021

Filing Number

605/2021

Filing Date

12-Nov-2021

Registration No

39/2021

Registration Date

12-Nov-2021

Court

Sub Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge.

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMUDHA

    Adv. THIRU. T.P.S. MANIKANNAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.APPANU @ MANIKANDAN

  2. 2.B. Ashokumar

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge.

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Await Records

    Subordinate Judge.

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Await Records

    Subordinate Judge.

  7. 12-Nov-2025

    Await Records

    Subordinate Judge.

  8. 07-Oct-2025

    Await Records

    Subordinate Judge.

  9. 02-Sep-2025

    Await Records

    Subordinate Judge.

  10. 28-Jul-2025

    Await Records

    Subordinate Judge.

  11. 26-Jun-2025

    Await Records

    Subordinate Judge.

  12. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge.

  13. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge.

  14. 01-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge.

  15. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge.

  16. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge.

  17. 03-Oct-2024

    DepositionView PDF

    In MCOP Case 39/2021 before the Tiruvarur Subordinate Court, petitioner Amudha filed a petition under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1875. The court accepted Amudha's affidavit as her examination-in-chief evidence, along with 12 supporting documents including FIR reports, medical certificates, X-rays, and bank statements. The respondents (Appanu @ Manikandan and B. Ashokumar) did not cross-examine the petitioner. The court allowed the petition and issued the required order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 03-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge.

  19. 05-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge.

  20. 04-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge.

  21. 11-Jun-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge.

  22. 08-Mar-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge.

  23. 23-Jan-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge.

  24. 08-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge.

  25. 14-Sep-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge.

  26. 25-Jul-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge.

  27. 20-Jun-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge.

  28. 10-Apr-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge.

  29. 09-Mar-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge.

  30. 02-Feb-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge.

  31. 06-Jan-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge.

  32. 01-Dec-2022

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge.

  33. 13-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge.

  34. 02-Sep-2022

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge.

  35. 26-Aug-2022

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge.

  36. 15-Jul-2022

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge.

  37. 22-Apr-2022

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge.

  38. 18-Feb-2022

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge.

  39. 21-Jan-2022

    Service Pending

    Subordinate Judge.

  40. 17-Dec-2021

    Service Pending

    Subordinate Judge.

  41. 17-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 12-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2021

casestatus.in Summary

In MCOP Case 39/2021 before the Tiruvarur Subordinate Court, petitioner Amudha filed a petition under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1875. The court accepted Amudha's affidavit as her examination-in-chief evidence, along with 12 supporting documents including FIR reports, medical certificates, X-rays, and bank statements. The respondents (Appanu @ Manikandan and B. Ashokumar) did not cross-examine the petitioner. The court allowed the petition and issued the required order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case