RAJASEKAR vs RADHAKRISHNAN — 110/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV030005052024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
379/2024
Filing Date
12-08-2024
Registration No
110/2024
Registration Date
03-09-2024
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJASEKAR
Adv. THIRU. T.P.S. MANIKANNAN, M.Com., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
RADHAKRISHNAN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Issue of Service
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 15-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 09-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In this loan dispute case (Asal Vaalkai No. 110/2024) before the Subordinate Court, Tiruvarur, the court examined conflicting testimonies regarding a ₹10,00,000 loan. The plaintiff claimed the defendant borrowed on 16.10.2023, while the defendant asserted the loan was taken on 20.01.2021 and substantially repaid (₹14,30,000 total with interest). The court found credibility issues with both parties' statements and noted disputes over repayment amounts, interest calculations, and documentary evidence. The case appears to be in the examination/cross-examination phase with the order documenting witness testimony rather than pronouncing a final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this loan dispute case (Asal Vaalkai No. 110/2024) before the Subordinate Court, Tiruvarur, the court examined conflicting testimonies regarding a ₹10,00,000 loan. The plaintiff claimed the defendant borrowed on 16.10.2023, while the defendant asserted the loan was taken on 20.01.2021 and substantially repaid (₹14,30,000 total with interest). The court found credibility issues with both parties' statements and noted disputes over repayment amounts, interest calculations, and documentary evidence. The case appears to be in the examination/cross-examination phase with the order documenting witness testimony rather than pronouncing a final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts