Kalaiselvi Sethuraman For Sai Ram Agencies, Tiruvarur vs Suresh — 115/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or-7 R-1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV030004952025

Filing Number

548/2025

Filing Date

12-Nov-2025

Registration No

115/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

Sub Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge.

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or-7 R-1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kalaiselvi Sethuraman For Sai Ram Agencies, Tiruvarur

    Adv. THIRU. T.P.S. MANIKANNAN, M.Com., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suresh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge.

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge.

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    This document is a procedural record from the Subordinate Court in Tiruvarur recording witness examination under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1875. The court certified that the witness's statement was typed under the judge's direction and supervision and was admitted by the witness as correct, but no substantive judgment on the merits of Case 115/2025 between Kalaiselvi Sethuraman (Sai Ram Agencies) and Suresh is presented in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge.

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge.

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge.

  11. 18-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 12-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 115/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a procedural record from the Subordinate Court in Tiruvarur recording witness examination under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1875. The court certified that the witness's statement was typed under the judge's direction and supervision and was admitted by the witness as correct, but no substantive judgment on the merits of Case 115/2025 between Kalaiselvi Sethuraman (Sai Ram Agencies) and Suresh is presented in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case