SADHANANDHAM vs SARAVANAN — 108/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV030004242022

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

448/2022

Filing Date

17-08-2022

Registration No

108/2022

Registration Date

24-08-2022

Court

Sub Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Order 7, Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

SADHANANDHAM

Adv. Thiru.S.Palaniraja

Respondent(s)

SARAVANAN

Hearing History

Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.

30-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

22-04-2026

Issue of Service

15-04-2026

Evidence

06-04-2026

Issue of Service

13-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

13-08-2024
Deposition
13-08-2024
Deposition
10-09-2024
Deposition
13-08-2025
Deposition
20-08-2025
Deposition
03-12-2025
Deposition
03-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: 108/2022 (Sadhanandham v. Saravanan) In this land dispute case heard by the Subordinate Court in Tiruvarur, the defendant Saravanan testified regarding property ownership claims. During cross-examination, disputes emerged over land extent (17 acres vs. claimed amounts), patta (deed) allocations showing 255 sq.m. for the petitioner and 445 sq.m. for the defendant, and the court assessor's finding that only 75 sq.m. fell under the petitioner's actual possession. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination on the next date of hearing (03.03.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 108/2022 (Sadhanandham v. Saravanan) In this land dispute case heard by the Subordinate Court in Tiruvarur, the defendant Saravanan testified regarding property ownership claims. During cross-examination, disputes emerged over land extent (17 acres vs. claimed amounts), patta (deed) allocations showing 255 sq.m. for the petitioner and 445 sq.m. for the defendant, and the court assessor's finding that only 75 sq.m. fell under the petitioner's actual possession. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination on the next date of hearing (03.03.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Tiruvarur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case