Mariyammal and Two others vs Vijayakumar — 121/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2),27(c). Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV030003612018
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
316/2018
Filing Date
24-10-2018
Registration No
121/2018
Registration Date
24-10-2018
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mariyammal and Two others
Adv. TPS.Manikannan
Ganesh
Adv. Tr.TPS.Manikannan
Minor Visnu rep. by gardiyan mother 1 pliantiff.
Adv. Tr.TPS.Manikannan
Respondent(s)
Vijayakumar
Punitha
Ajay
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Written Statement
Batta
Issue of Service
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Written Statement |
| 24-03-2026 | Batta |
| 18-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 13-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 17-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 121/2018 Outcome: Case adjourned. The court recorded the cross-examination of defendant Vijayakumar (witness PW1) on 21.08.2024 in this partition suit. The petitioners (Mariyammal, Ganesh, and minor Visnu) seek division of ancestral property listed in the plaint with five exhibits. The defendant's testimony addressed the origin of property documents (RS 541/5B, RS 387/1, documents 359/3, 359/1, RS 386/8, and a 2002 power of attorney), claiming property belonged to his father Vijayaraghavan despite being in others' names, and that he already distributed 500 sq.ft. land and ₹1,00,000 to the petitioners. No cross-examination objection was recorded; proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 121/2018 Outcome: Case adjourned. The court recorded the cross-examination of defendant Vijayakumar (witness PW1) on 21.08.2024 in this partition suit. The petitioners (Mariyammal, Ganesh, and minor Visnu) seek division of ancestral property listed in the plaint with five exhibits. The defendant's testimony addressed the origin of property documents (RS 541/5B, RS 387/1, documents 359/3, 359/1, RS 386/8, and a 2002 power of attorney), claiming property belonged to his father Vijayaraghavan despite being in others' names, and that he already distributed 500 sq.ft. land and ₹1,00,000 to the petitioners. No cross-examination objection was recorded; proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts