Sekar vs Manivannan and 10 Others — 109/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d),27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV030003282018
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
287/2018
Filing Date
25-09-2018
Registration No
109/2018
Registration Date
25-09-2018
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sekar
Adv. Tr.R.Srinivasarathnam and R.Dharani
Respondent(s)
Manivannan and 10 Others
Kamalakannan
Santhamurthy
Sargunam
Kannan
Anandh
Saraswathi
Kamalambika
Ramani
Rajesh Raj
Dineshraj
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Issue of Service
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 17-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 24-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 13-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 05-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
This document records cross-examination testimony of a witness in a property dispute case before the Tiruvarur Subordinate Court (Case 109/2018) on 11.11.2025. The witness testifies regarding property details, property sales involving Manivannan, Santhamurthy, and others, and various agreements related to a press business. The court admitted the witness testimony as correctly recorded by Judge M. Murugan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records cross-examination testimony of a witness in a property dispute case before the Tiruvarur Subordinate Court (Case 109/2018) on 11.11.2025. The witness testifies regarding property details, property sales involving Manivannan, Santhamurthy, and others, and various agreements related to a press business. The court admitted the witness testimony as correctly recorded by Judge M. Murugan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts