Sekar and 3 Others vs MARIYAMMAL and 5 Others — 125/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV030003052020
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
379/2020
Filing Date
15-09-2020
Registration No
125/2020
Registration Date
15-12-2020
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sekar and 3 Others
Adv. S. BHARATHI, B.Com., B.L.,
Sagunthala
Jayalakshmi
Anjammal
Respondent(s)
MARIYAMMAL and 5 Others
Ravisankar
Govindaraj
Assistant Electrical Engineer (A and E)
Dekshinamoorthy
Chitra
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 125/2020, Subordinate Court, Tiruvarur Date: 20.04.2026 Judge: M. Murugan, Subordinate Judge This is a civil suit (likely concerning land/property ownership) where the court recorded the testimony of the plaintiff's witness. The witness provided detailed testimony regarding property ownership claims, land documents, house construction, and related disputes in the village. The court documented the witness's statement regarding the plaintiff's rights to the disputed property and various documentary evidence presented during cross-examination. The order appears to be a witness deposition record certified by the judge rather than a final judgment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 125/2020, Subordinate Court, Tiruvarur Date: 20.04.2026 Judge: M. Murugan, Subordinate Judge This is a civil suit (likely concerning land/property ownership) where the court recorded the testimony of the plaintiff's witness. The witness provided detailed testimony regarding property ownership claims, land documents, house construction, and related disputes in the village. The court documented the witness's statement regarding the plaintiff's rights to the disputed property and various documentary evidence presented during cross-examination. The order appears to be a witness deposition record certified by the judge rather than a final judgment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts