SENGUTTUVAN vs SECRETARY, VANDAMPALAI PANCHAYAT, NANNILAM TALUK — 63/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTV030002462023

IA Pending

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

Filing Number

204/2023

Filing Date

17-03-2023

Registration No

63/2023

Registration Date

10-07-2023

Court

Sub Court, Tiruvarur

Judge

3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Order 7, Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

SENGUTTUVAN

Adv. THIRU. T.P.S. MANIKANNAN

Respondent(s)

SECRETARY, VANDAMPALAI PANCHAYAT, NANNILAM TALUK

The president

The District Development Officer

The Project Director

The Tahsildar

The District Collector

Hearing History

Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.

07-04-2026

IA Pending

13-03-2026

IA Pending

24-02-2026

IA Pending

12-02-2026

IA Pending

30-01-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

23-09-2024
Deposition
28-10-2025
Deposition
21-11-2025
Deposition

Case Summary: 63/2023 This is a property dispute case where petitioner Senguttuvan contests the Vandampalai Panchayat's claim over land parcels. Senguttuvan's family purchased plots 3 and 4 in 2008 and claims ownership of 4,592 square feet. The panchayat allegedly occupied and constructed structures on the land in 2014 without authorization. The petitioner argues he has valid title deeds and that the panchayat's encroachment is illegal. The document reflects the court's examination of the petitioner's testimony regarding land boundaries, property transfers, and settlement documentation. The case involves disputed land ownership between a private citizen and local panchayat authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 63/2023 This is a property dispute case where petitioner Senguttuvan contests the Vandampalai Panchayat's claim over land parcels. Senguttuvan's family purchased plots 3 and 4 in 2008 and claims ownership of 4,592 square feet. The panchayat allegedly occupied and constructed structures on the land in 2014 without authorization. The petitioner argues he has valid title deeds and that the panchayat's encroachment is illegal. The document reflects the court's examination of the petitioner's testimony regarding land boundaries, property transfers, and settlement documentation. The case involves disputed land ownership between a private citizen and local panchayat authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Tiruvarur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case