SENGUTTUVAN vs SECRETARY, VANDAMPALAI PANCHAYAT, NANNILAM TALUK — 63/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV030002462023
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
204/2023
Filing Date
17-03-2023
Registration No
63/2023
Registration Date
10-07-2023
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SENGUTTUVAN
Adv. THIRU. T.P.S. MANIKANNAN
Respondent(s)
SECRETARY, VANDAMPALAI PANCHAYAT, NANNILAM TALUK
The president
The District Development Officer
The Project Director
The Tahsildar
The District Collector
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 13-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 24-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 12-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 30-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 63/2023 This is a property dispute case where petitioner Senguttuvan contests the Vandampalai Panchayat's claim over land parcels. Senguttuvan's family purchased plots 3 and 4 in 2008 and claims ownership of 4,592 square feet. The panchayat allegedly occupied and constructed structures on the land in 2014 without authorization. The petitioner argues he has valid title deeds and that the panchayat's encroachment is illegal. The document reflects the court's examination of the petitioner's testimony regarding land boundaries, property transfers, and settlement documentation. The case involves disputed land ownership between a private citizen and local panchayat authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 63/2023 This is a property dispute case where petitioner Senguttuvan contests the Vandampalai Panchayat's claim over land parcels. Senguttuvan's family purchased plots 3 and 4 in 2008 and claims ownership of 4,592 square feet. The panchayat allegedly occupied and constructed structures on the land in 2014 without authorization. The petitioner argues he has valid title deeds and that the panchayat's encroachment is illegal. The document reflects the court's examination of the petitioner's testimony regarding land boundaries, property transfers, and settlement documentation. The case involves disputed land ownership between a private citizen and local panchayat authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts