R. Tamilarasan vs N. Dhanalakshmi — 51/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV030001392020
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
161/2020
Filing Date
19-03-2020
Registration No
51/2020
Registration Date
20-03-2020
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R. Tamilarasan
Adv. THIRU. K. SADASIVAM
Respondent(s)
N. Dhanalakshmi
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 51/2020 (Tiruvarur Subordinate Court) R. Tamilarasan v. N. Dhanalakshmi – The court examined cross-examination testimony regarding a property purchase dated 15.11.2019. The petitioner purchased land from Muthudewal, who had acquired it from Saravanadeval through a settlement deed signed by Saravanadeval's mother. The key issues involved alleged fraudulent documentation, unauthorized possession transfer, and a related pending case (A.V. No. 29/2020). The court's examination focused on establishing facts concerning property ownership, settlement validity, and the petitioner's entitlement to relief regarding the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 51/2020 (Tiruvarur Subordinate Court) R. Tamilarasan v. N. Dhanalakshmi – The court examined cross-examination testimony regarding a property purchase dated 15.11.2019. The petitioner purchased land from Muthudewal, who had acquired it from Saravanadeval through a settlement deed signed by Saravanadeval's mother. The key issues involved alleged fraudulent documentation, unauthorized possession transfer, and a related pending case (A.V. No. 29/2020). The court's examination focused on establishing facts concerning property ownership, settlement validity, and the petitioner's entitlement to relief regarding the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts