D. Ravindraganesan vs Vijaya and 12 others — 39/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 80-2 pod cpc. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTV030001382021
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
132/2021
Filing Date
12-03-2021
Registration No
39/2021
Registration Date
27-03-2021
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D. Ravindraganesan
Adv. THIRU. V. VARATHARAJAN
Respondent(s)
Vijaya and 12 others
S. Lakshmi
S. Abirami
A. Rethinavelu
Suthakar
Sathasivampillai
The Sub-Registrar
The Thasildhar
The District Collector
The Superintending Engineer
Asst. Executive Engineer
The President
Chairman
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE.
Evidence
Evidence
Batta
Issue of Service
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Batta |
| 13-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a will dispute case (Case 39/2021) before the Subordinate Court in Tiruvarur, Tamil Nadu. The document records the cross-examination testimony of a prosecution witness regarding a will allegedly executed on 15.04.1974 by one Arumugan in favor of his brother Tekshinamurthy. The witness (son of Nadarajan) was questioned about the authenticity of signatures, the will's execution, and circumstances surrounding it. The witness admitted inability to identify the testator's signature on certain documents and contradicted his own earlier statements. No final judgment or order is issued in this excerpt—it is merely the recorded testimony during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a will dispute case (Case 39/2021) before the Subordinate Court in Tiruvarur, Tamil Nadu. The document records the cross-examination testimony of a prosecution witness regarding a will allegedly executed on 15.04.1974 by one Arumugan in favor of his brother Tekshinamurthy. The witness (son of Nadarajan) was questioned about the authenticity of signatures, the will's execution, and circumstances surrounding it. The witness admitted inability to identify the testator's signature on certain documents and contradicted his own earlier statements. No final judgment or order is issued in this excerpt—it is merely the recorded testimony during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts