D.SENTHILKUMAR vs R.KUMAR AND TWO PERSONS — 9/2021
Case under Tn Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974 Section 140, 166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTV030000942021
Filing Number
95/2021
Filing Date
18-Feb-2021
Registration No
9/2021
Registration Date
18-Feb-2021
Court
Sub Court, Tiruvarur
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge.
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.D.SENTHILKUMAR
Adv. TMT. B. VINOTHINE B.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
-
1.R.KUMAR AND TWO PERSONS
-
2.Manjula
-
3.The Branch Manager
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
Orders
Subordinate Judge.
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge.
-
05-Mar-2026
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Subordinate Judge.
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge.
-
11-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: MCOP No. 09/2021 This is a motor vehicle accident compensation case heard before the Subordinate Judge at Tiruvarur under Section 10 of the 1875 Act. The court recorded the examination-in-chief of the third respondent (witness), who testified regarding the accident and insurance coverage details. The witness confirmed that the vehicle involved in the accident lacked valid insurance on the date of the incident and the driver did not possess a valid driving license. The court found that the insurance institution is liable to pay compensation as per the petition filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge.
-
28-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge.
-
27-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge.
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge.
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge.
-
09-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge.
-
07-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge.
-
02-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge.
-
11-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge.
-
28-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge.
-
20-Jun-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge.
-
08-Apr-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge.
-
27-Feb-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge.
-
01-Feb-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge.
-
22-Jan-2025
Steps
Subordinate Judge.
-
06-Dec-2024
Batta
Subordinate Judge.
-
07-Nov-2024
Batta
Subordinate Judge.
-
26-Sep-2024
Batta
Subordinate Judge.
-
05-Sep-2024
Publication
Subordinate Judge.
-
11-Jul-2024
Publication
Subordinate Judge.
-
22-Apr-2024
Publication
Subordinate Judge.
-
19-Apr-2024
Steps
Subordinate Judge.
-
14-Feb-2024
Steps
Subordinate Judge.
-
08-Dec-2023
Steps
Subordinate Judge.
-
11-Oct-2023
Steps
Subordinate Judge.
-
10-Aug-2023
Steps
Subordinate Judge.
-
27-Jun-2023
Batta
Subordinate Judge.
-
20-Mar-2023
Batta
Subordinate Judge.
-
10-Feb-2023
Batta
Subordinate Judge.
-
06-Jan-2023
Batta
Subordinate Judge.
-
24-Nov-2022
Batta
Subordinate Judge.
-
13-Oct-2022
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge.
-
02-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge.
-
26-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge.
-
15-Jul-2022
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge.
-
22-Apr-2022
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge.
-
12-Mar-2022
Batta
Subordinate Judge.
-
18-Feb-2022
Batta
Subordinate Judge.
-
21-Jan-2022
Service Pending
Subordinate Judge.
-
21-Dec-2021
Service Pending
Subordinate Judge.
-
11-Dec-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge.
-
26-Nov-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge.
-
26-Oct-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge.
-
05-Oct-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge.
-
27-Sep-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge.
-
07-Aug-2021
Service Pending
Subordinate Judge.
-
23-Jun-2021
Service Pending
Subordinate Judge.
-
20-Apr-2021
Service Pending
Subordinate Judge.
-
19-Mar-2021
Service Pending
Subordinate Judge.
-
19-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2021
Case Summary: MCOP No. 09/2021 This is a motor vehicle accident compensation case heard before the Subordinate Judge at Tiruvarur under Section 10 of the 1875 Act. The court recorded the examination-in-chief of the third respondent (witness), who testified regarding the accident and insurance coverage details. The witness confirmed that the vehicle involved in the accident lacked valid insurance on the date of the incident and the driver did not possess a valid driving license. The court found that the insurance institution is liable to pay compensation as per the petition filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts